Free for open-source maintainers
The peer-review leaderboard for open-source GitHub repos.
Submit your repo and collect 800+ character peer reviews from GitHub-verified developers. The leaderboard follows published rules. No black-box algorithm. No launch-day window.
Persistent peer review, not launch-day hype
Product Hunt rewards the moment. RepoRanker rewards the work. Reviews live on the repo page permanently, rankings follow rules you can read, and feedback is written by developers who have GitHub skin in the game.
Product Hunt
RepoRanker ✓
Built for
Product launches (any category)
Open-source GitHub repos only
Feedback format
Upvotes + short comments
800+ character written reviews
Ranking logic
Launch-day vote momentum
Reviews + star momentum, formula published
Feedback lifespan
Fades after launch day
Permanent on every repo page
Reviewer identity
Any account
GitHub-verified, no self-review
Full comparison: vs Product Hunt, GitHub Trending & Awesome lists →
Real reviews from the community
What an 800-character review actually looks like
What a real review looks like
“Hackeroom is a thoughtful attempt to turn Claude Code into a visible, configurable development team. Members can have separate roles, models, skills, budgets, and permission modes, while a deterministic orchestrator controls planning, review, coding, testing, auditing, and deployment. …
What a real review looks like
“This project goes well beyond a basic MERN login example. It implements email verification, password reset, Google OAuth, TOTP-based MFA, hashed single-use recovery codes, short-lived access tokens, Redis-backed refresh sessions, token rotation, and refresh-token reuse detection. …
A multi-factor authentication system built with the MERN Stack that demonstrates modern authentication architecture and security best practices.
What a real review looks like
“pc-init turns a repetitive setup task into a well-designed command-line workflow. Its language and framework catalog is data-driven, with metadata and preset files kept beside each other instead of hard-coded throughout the application. …
Generate a pre-commit or prek .pre-commit-config.yaml for your project from curated language and framework presets — so you get the right linters, formatters, a
Submit. Review. Earn. Boost.
A credit economy where contribution is the only path to visibility.
Submit your repo for free
Any active public GitHub repo qualifies. Add a tagline. Your project goes live on the leaderboard immediately. No approval queue. No card.
Write one peer review
Pick a repo you've used or have strong opinions on. Write 800 characters: what it does, who it's for, what could improve. The maintainer has 48 hours to dispute low-effort or off-topic submissions. After that the review goes public and you earn 10 credits.
Spend credits on visibility (or skip them)
Use earned credits to pin your repo at the top of the feed or take a Featured spotlight. Boosts also work in cash, from $2. The leaderboard itself is always free.
Submit
free
Review others
800+ chars
48h window
dispute period
+10 credits
when released
Boost
optional
Worked example. Review 2 repos this week → 48h windows close → earn 20 credits → run a 20-credit leaderboard boost. Or skip reviewing and pay $2. Full credit math →
How we keep this honest
The credit economy only works if reviews are real. Four guardrails make that the default, not the exception.
48-hour dispute window
Reviews don't go live, and credits don't unlock, until 48 hours after submission. The reviewed maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text and stop both from happening.
GitHub-only sign-in
Every reviewer is tied to a public GitHub developer profile. No anonymous accounts, no email-only signups, no throwaway identities behind reviews.
No self-dealing
You cannot review your own repos. You cannot review the same repo twice. Boost purchases are visible on the leaderboard so paid placement is always identifiable.
Deterministic ranking
The Top sort follows a published formula: peer reviews, star growth since submission, and optional boosts capped at 2x. No hidden engagement model. Same inputs, same order, for everyone.
Read the full moderation policy →·Ranking rules·Content policy
Open-source repo leaderboard
Full leaderboard →- 126webtest-orchLive
🇬🇧 English · 🇷🇺 Русский
Python★41 reviews - 127DEMOSTRACIONES
A repository for documenting and sharing mathematical proofs, written in LaTeX with clarity, rigor, and professional style.
TeX★41 reviews - 128playwright-best-practices
Production-grade Playwright patterns and best practices for scalable automation.
·★41 reviews - 129claude-statuslineLive
🇬🇧 English · 🇷🇺 Русский
Shell★41 reviews - 130OpenCmdAnywhere
一个简单的小程序，它能够帮助你通过快捷键以“当前窗口的可执行文件所在目录”为工作路径打开命令行程序，此外若当前窗口是文件管理器，它能够以文件管理器所在文件夹作为工作路径，而不用右键点击选择“在此处打开命令行”。
C++★41 reviews - 131quietline
Simple and quiet zsh shell theme, inspired by headline theme.
Shell★41 reviews - 132opencv5sharpLive
High-performance, cross-platform .NET wrapper for OpenCV 5 with CUDA and cuDNN GPU acceleration.
C++★41 reviews - 133remote-mcp-adapter
Centralize and secure MCP servers without worrying about the file-sharing problem.
Python★41 reviews - 134awesome-ai-native-jobsLive
A curated map of the new generation of AI-native jobs — the roles, real salaries, skills, interview prep, and projects to land them.
·★41 reviews - 135Austra
Austra seems to be another spelling for Ostara or Ēostre, a West Germanic spring goddess. It is also a catchy name for a software library, but I may be wrong on
C#★41 reviews - 136pix-automatico-reference
Implementação de referência production-grade para Pix Automático + Open Finance Brasil
Java★31 reviews - 137LectorcitoPro
Herramienta de escritorio profesional para auditoría de código, documentación técnica y consolidación de contextos para Inteligencia Artificial.
Python★31 reviews - 138MERN-Authentication-SystemLive
A multi-factor authentication system built with the MERN Stack that demonstrates modern authentication architecture and security best practices.
JavaScript★31 reviews - 139lubuntu-system-tools
Copyright © 2026 William Hutton
Shell★31 reviews - 140PretendAi
In 1950, Alan Turing proposed a simple but revolutionary question:
HTML★31 reviews - 141Lorapok-API_AtlasLive
◈ Lorapok · Open Source Intelligence
TypeScript★31 reviews - 142TriCacheLive
tricache is an extremely fast three-tier Node.js cache library. It serves warm reads at 2.81 million operations per second from a single thread — over 100× fast
TypeScript★31 reviews - 143xcsv
Convert Excel (.xlsx) workbooks to CSV, one CSV per sheet. With a crate to use it directly in your own projects or the precompiled binary to use as a subprocess
Rust★31 reviews - 144wolfstarLive
A powerful bot designed to enhance your server experience.
TypeScript★31 reviews - 145Suri-Studio
> Suri Studio is in early development. Features and APIs may change between releases.
Python★31 reviews - 146abhinu-dev_basic-ictlLive
A basic Programming Language - Bridging the Gap between text based programming and block based coding.
Tcl★31 reviews - 147cycles-server
Self-hosted server that enforces hard limits on AI agent spend, risk, and tool actions before execution. Reference implementation of the Cycles Protocol
Java★31 reviews - 148KaizenReplyLive
> Messages don't get rewritten. They evolve. Improve every message, one Kaizen at a time.
JavaScript★31 reviews - 149KaguneBinLive
A dark-themed, developer-focused pastebin inspired by the world of Tokyo Ghoul.
HTML★31 reviews - 150gohanLive
A simple, fast static site generator written in Go — featuring incremental builds, syntax highlighting, Mermaid diagrams, and a live-reload dev server.
Go★31 reviews
Common questions
Why the 48-hour delay before a review is released?
The maintainer can dispute a review that breaks the rules during the window. If there is no dispute, the review is published, credits are granted, and the review is visible to everyone. That keeps the review pool higher quality.
How do you prevent fake reviews and self-dealing?
Sign-in is GitHub-only, so every reviewer is tied to a public developer profile. You cannot review your own repos. Reviews must clear 800 characters before submission. Every review enters a 48-hour dispute window where the maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text. Disputed reviews don't release and the reviewer earns no credits. See our content policy for full rules.
What stops paid boosts from buying #1?
Boosts are a multiplier on your organic score, capped at 2x. A repo with zero reviews scores zero regardless of boosts. A well-reviewed repo always beats a heavily-boosted one. See /rules for the full formula.
What is a credit?
A credit is a point you earn by writing reviews and spend on boosts. New accounts start with 25 free credits. Write an 800-character review and earn 10 more when it's released after the 48-hour dispute window.
Is it free to list my repo?
Yes. Submitting your repo and appearing on the leaderboard costs nothing. You only pay when you want extra visibility. Leaderboard boosts start at $2.
More questions? See the full FAQ →
293
repos listed
300
reviews published
249
developers
Who built this
Jay Campbell
@thejaycampbell·Founder, RepoRanker
I built RepoRanker because the vibe-coding wave produced thousands of new builders shipping in public, and there was nowhere to get substantive peer feedback on the actual work. GitHub is public but passive. Launch communities reward the moment, not the repo. RepoRanker is the place where critiques are earned, not gamed: reviewing another project earns you credits, so the feedback is real and the community has skin in the game.
Ship it. Then prove it.
60 seconds to submit. Zero approval queue. Or start by reviewing a project you already know and earn credits toward your own boost. See pricing for optional visibility options.