Free for open-source maintainers
The peer-review leaderboard for open-source GitHub repos.
Submit your repo and collect 800+ character peer reviews from GitHub-verified developers. The leaderboard follows published rules. No black-box algorithm. No launch-day window.
Persistent peer review, not launch-day hype
Product Hunt rewards the moment. RepoRanker rewards the work. Reviews live on the repo page permanently, rankings follow rules you can read, and feedback is written by developers who have GitHub skin in the game.
Product Hunt
RepoRanker ✓
Built for
Product launches (any category)
Open-source GitHub repos only
Feedback format
Upvotes + short comments
800+ character written reviews
Ranking logic
Launch-day vote momentum
Reviews + star momentum, formula published
Feedback lifespan
Fades after launch day
Permanent on every repo page
Reviewer identity
Any account
GitHub-verified, no self-review
Full comparison: vs Product Hunt, GitHub Trending & Awesome lists →
Real reviews from the community
What an 800-character review actually looks like
What a real review looks like
“This project goes well beyond a basic MERN login example. It implements email verification, password reset, Google OAuth, TOTP-based MFA, hashed single-use recovery codes, short-lived access tokens, Redis-backed refresh sessions, token rotation, and refresh-token reuse detection. …
A multi-factor authentication system built with the MERN Stack that demonstrates modern authentication architecture and security best practices.
What a real review looks like
“pc-init turns a repetitive setup task into a well-designed command-line workflow. Its language and framework catalog is data-driven, with metadata and preset files kept beside each other instead of hard-coded throughout the application. …
Generate a pre-commit or prek .pre-commit-config.yaml for your project from curated language and framework presets — so you get the right linters, formatters, a
What a real review looks like
“FastKML is a mature and technically substantial implementation for reading, writing, and manipulating KML and KMZ data. Its model covers a wide range of KML features, styles, links, views, time elements, overlays, Google extensions, and geometry integration through PyGeoIf and __geo_interface__. …
A Python library for reading, writing and manipulating KML files.
Submit. Review. Earn. Boost.
A credit economy where contribution is the only path to visibility.
Submit your repo for free
Any active public GitHub repo qualifies. Add a tagline. Your project goes live on the leaderboard immediately. No approval queue. No card.
Write one peer review
Pick a repo you've used or have strong opinions on. Write 800 characters: what it does, who it's for, what could improve. The maintainer has 48 hours to dispute low-effort or off-topic submissions. After that the review goes public and you earn 10 credits.
Spend credits on visibility (or skip them)
Use earned credits to pin your repo at the top of the feed or take a Featured spotlight. Boosts also work in cash, from $2. The leaderboard itself is always free.
Submit
free
Review others
800+ chars
48h window
dispute period
+10 credits
when released
Boost
optional
Worked example. Review 2 repos this week → 48h windows close → earn 20 credits → run a 20-credit leaderboard boost. Or skip reviewing and pay $2. Full credit math →
How we keep this honest
The credit economy only works if reviews are real. Four guardrails make that the default, not the exception.
48-hour dispute window
Reviews don't go live, and credits don't unlock, until 48 hours after submission. The reviewed maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text and stop both from happening.
GitHub-only sign-in
Every reviewer is tied to a public GitHub developer profile. No anonymous accounts, no email-only signups, no throwaway identities behind reviews.
No self-dealing
You cannot review your own repos. You cannot review the same repo twice. Boost purchases are visible on the leaderboard so paid placement is always identifiable.
Deterministic ranking
The Top sort follows a published formula: peer reviews, star growth since submission, and optional boosts capped at 2x. No hidden engagement model. Same inputs, same order, for everyone.
Read the full moderation policy →·Ranking rules·Content policy
Open-source repo leaderboard
Full leaderboard →- 1brigadeLive
Brigade - Your personal intelligence, built enterprise-grade
TypeScript★3.1k1 reviews - 2WaifuX
|------|:----:|------|
Swift★1.3k3 reviews - 3BitFun
Open-source Rust desktop AI agent with coding workflows, Mini Apps, and self-hosted device sync.
Rust★1.8k1 reviews - 4MERN-Authentication-SystemLive
A multi-factor authentication system built with the MERN Stack that demonstrates modern authentication architecture and security best practices.
JavaScript★31 reviews - 5banksiaLive
Adaptable, accountable AI teams. Visually
Python★960 reviews - 6mouziLive
> Your downloads, tamed.
Astro★8285 reviews - 7scc
A tool similar to cloc, sloccount and tokei. For counting the lines of code, blank lines, comment lines, and physical lines of source code in many programming l
Go★8.6k2 reviews - 8Cybermes
Quick Start • Architecture • Automated PDF Reports • Skills Layer • Discussions & Rules • Documentation • Release Notes
Python★2910 reviews - 9dev-houseLive
Give Claude Code a dev team.
TypeScript★160 reviews - 10ZephyrLive
A modern, lightweight, and secure Mihomo / Clash Meta GUI client built with Tauri and Rust.
JavaScript★6932 reviews - 11MudBlazor
Build stunning, interactive web applications with MudBlazor — the open-source Material Design library for Blazor.
C#★10.6k2 reviews - 12aimeos-laravel
Laravel ecommerce package for ultra fast online shops, scalable marketplaces, complex B2B applications and #gigacommerce :star: Star us on GitHub 😀
PHP★8.7k2 reviews - 13httptap
httptap is a rich-powered CLI that dissects an HTTP request into every meaningful phase-DNS, TCP connect, TLS
Python★8001 reviews - 14oppiaLive
Oppia is an online learning tool that enables anyone to easily create and share interactive activities (called 'explorations'). These activities simulate a one-
Python★6.8k2 reviews - 15weathrLive
A terminal weather app with ASCII animations driven by real-time weather data.
Rust★3.0k3 reviews - 16FLUJOLive
Turn your models and MCP tools into AI workflows you can chat with, automate, and call from other apps.
TypeScript★6131 reviews - 17intelli-shell
IntelliShell is a powerful command template and snippet manager for your shell.
Rust★1.3k3 reviews - 18openagentLive
An end-to-end AI agent platform for building, orchestrating, publishing, and operating AI applications.
Python★7961 reviews - 19aural-ossLive
Self-hostable AI interviews over voice, chat, and video with adaptive follow-ups and structured scoring.
TypeScript★1971 reviews - 20tura
Tura: 16.7% better performance, 77.5% fewer rounds — a local, open-source coding agent that understands repositories before editing.
Rust★6002 reviews - 21pagible
Easy, flexible and powerful cloud-native Laravel CMS package powered by AI with JSON:API, GraphQL API, templates, and themes
PHP★5832 reviews - 22link
Local, source-backed memory for LLM agents.
Python★1702 reviews - 23google-surf-mcpLive
Google search MCP. One MCP replaces search + fetch + academic-paper extractor.
TypeScript★2841 reviews - 24LiansLive
Memory for Claude, Codex, Cursor, and any MCP agent. Free locally or $10/month managed.
Python★101 reviews - 25NoWreckLive
A deterministic verifier for AI coding assistants.
Python★51 reviews
Common questions
Why the 48-hour delay before a review is released?
The maintainer can dispute a review that breaks the rules during the window. If there is no dispute, the review is published, credits are granted, and the review is visible to everyone. That keeps the review pool higher quality.
How do you prevent fake reviews and self-dealing?
Sign-in is GitHub-only, so every reviewer is tied to a public developer profile. You cannot review your own repos. Reviews must clear 800 characters before submission. Every review enters a 48-hour dispute window where the maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text. Disputed reviews don't release and the reviewer earns no credits. See our content policy for full rules.
What stops paid boosts from buying #1?
Boosts are a multiplier on your organic score, capped at 2x. A repo with zero reviews scores zero regardless of boosts. A well-reviewed repo always beats a heavily-boosted one. See /rules for the full formula.
What is a credit?
A credit is a point you earn by writing reviews and spend on boosts. New accounts start with 25 free credits. Write an 800-character review and earn 10 more when it's released after the 48-hour dispute window.
Is it free to list my repo?
Yes. Submitting your repo and appearing on the leaderboard costs nothing. You only pay when you want extra visibility. Leaderboard boosts start at $2.
More questions? See the full FAQ →
293
repos listed
299
reviews published
249
developers
Who built this
Jay Campbell
@thejaycampbell·Founder, RepoRanker
I built RepoRanker because the vibe-coding wave produced thousands of new builders shipping in public, and there was nowhere to get substantive peer feedback on the actual work. GitHub is public but passive. Launch communities reward the moment, not the repo. RepoRanker is the place where critiques are earned, not gamed: reviewing another project earns you credits, so the feedback is real and the community has skin in the game.
Ship it. Then prove it.
60 seconds to submit. Zero approval queue. Or start by reviewing a project you already know and earn credits toward your own boost. See pricing for optional visibility options.