Free for open-source maintainers
The peer-review leaderboard for open-source GitHub repos.
Submit your repo and collect 800+ character peer reviews from GitHub-verified developers. The leaderboard follows published rules. No black-box algorithm. No launch-day window.
Persistent peer review, not launch-day hype
Product Hunt rewards the moment. RepoRanker rewards the work. Reviews live on the repo page permanently, rankings follow rules you can read, and feedback is written by developers who have GitHub skin in the game.
Product Hunt
RepoRanker ✓
Built for
Product launches (any category)
Open-source GitHub repos only
Feedback format
Upvotes + short comments
800+ character written reviews
Ranking logic
Launch-day vote momentum
Reviews + star momentum, formula published
Feedback lifespan
Fades after launch day
Permanent on every repo page
Reviewer identity
Any account
GitHub-verified, no self-review
Full comparison: vs Product Hunt, GitHub Trending & Awesome lists →
Real reviews from the community
What an 800-character review actually looks like
What a real review looks like
“Hackeroom is a thoughtful attempt to turn Claude Code into a visible, configurable development team. Members can have separate roles, models, skills, budgets, and permission modes, while a deterministic orchestrator controls planning, review, coding, testing, auditing, and deployment. …
What a real review looks like
“This project goes well beyond a basic MERN login example. It implements email verification, password reset, Google OAuth, TOTP-based MFA, hashed single-use recovery codes, short-lived access tokens, Redis-backed refresh sessions, token rotation, and refresh-token reuse detection. …
A multi-factor authentication system built with the MERN Stack that demonstrates modern authentication architecture and security best practices.
What a real review looks like
“pc-init turns a repetitive setup task into a well-designed command-line workflow. Its language and framework catalog is data-driven, with metadata and preset files kept beside each other instead of hard-coded throughout the application. …
Generate a pre-commit or prek .pre-commit-config.yaml for your project from curated language and framework presets — so you get the right linters, formatters, a
Submit. Review. Earn. Boost.
A credit economy where contribution is the only path to visibility.
Submit your repo for free
Any active public GitHub repo qualifies. Add a tagline. Your project goes live on the leaderboard immediately. No approval queue. No card.
Write one peer review
Pick a repo you've used or have strong opinions on. Write 800 characters: what it does, who it's for, what could improve. The maintainer has 48 hours to dispute low-effort or off-topic submissions. After that the review goes public and you earn 10 credits.
Spend credits on visibility (or skip them)
Use earned credits to pin your repo at the top of the feed or take a Featured spotlight. Boosts also work in cash, from $2. The leaderboard itself is always free.
Submit
free
Review others
800+ chars
48h window
dispute period
+10 credits
when released
Boost
optional
Worked example. Review 2 repos this week → 48h windows close → earn 20 credits → run a 20-credit leaderboard boost. Or skip reviewing and pay $2. Full credit math →
How we keep this honest
The credit economy only works if reviews are real. Four guardrails make that the default, not the exception.
48-hour dispute window
Reviews don't go live, and credits don't unlock, until 48 hours after submission. The reviewed maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text and stop both from happening.
GitHub-only sign-in
Every reviewer is tied to a public GitHub developer profile. No anonymous accounts, no email-only signups, no throwaway identities behind reviews.
No self-dealing
You cannot review your own repos. You cannot review the same repo twice. Boost purchases are visible on the leaderboard so paid placement is always identifiable.
Deterministic ranking
The Top sort follows a published formula: peer reviews, star growth since submission, and optional boosts capped at 2x. No hidden engagement model. Same inputs, same order, for everyone.
Read the full moderation policy →·Ranking rules·Content policy
Open-source repo leaderboard
Full leaderboard →- 51slide-deck-aiLive
Co-create PowerPoint slide decks with AI -- online or on-premise!
Python★3731 reviews - 52google-surf-mcpLive
Google search MCP. One MCP replaces search + fetch + academic-paper extractor.
TypeScript★2841 reviews - 53ggcLive
📖 Full documentation: https://bmf-san.github.io/ggc/
Go★2841 reviews - 54fastkmlLive
A Python library for reading, writing and manipulating KML files.
Python★2571 reviews - 55flowentLive
A workflow orchestration platform for multi-agent collaboration.
Python★2421 reviews - 56aural-ossLive
Self-hostable AI interviews over voice, chat, and video with adaptive follow-ups and structured scoring.
TypeScript★1971 reviews - 57go-string
Useful string utility functions for Go projects. Either because they are faster than the common Go version or do not exist in the standard library.
Go★1941 reviews - 58nixie
Nixie is a portable script to launch the Nix package manager without installing it, as part of a repository's canonical tools.
Python★1271 reviews - 59vibe-code-stack-for-ceos
Stop prompting. Start delegating. The full-stack monorepo where Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, Copilot, and Windsurf all read one company handbook — and
TypeScript★1241 reviews - 60MacMusicPlayer
An elegant and minimalist menu bar music player for macOS (no Dock icon), providing a seamless music playback experience.
Swift★901 reviews - 61BetterFlyLive
> Your lightweight, dynamic, and intelligent desktop companion.
HTML★781 reviews - 62aura
Aura is an open-source artificial mind built to persist beyond the prompt—maintaining identity, memory, inner state, and self-directed cognition on your Mac.
Python★761 reviews - 63pygeoifLive
When you want to write your own geospatial library with support for this protocol you may use pygeoif as a starting point and build your functionality on top of
Python★741 reviews - 64talonLive
Run persistent AI agents across Telegram, Discord, Teams, terminal and desktop—with multiple backends and full MCP tool access.
TypeScript★711 reviews - 65code-stickLive
> Plug in a USB. Get an offline AI coding agent on any laptop.
TypeScript★611 reviews - 66quantum-zsh
Welcome to Quantum Theme: a sleek, dynamic zsh theme built for speed, style, and shell supremacy.
Shell★491 reviews - 67better_bing_image_downloaderLive
A fast, reliable Python library and CLI tool for bulk downloading images from Bing or DuckDuckGo.
Python★471 reviews - 68Retromod
> Run older Minecraft mods on newer versions through bytecode transformation and API shimming.
Java★461 reviews - 69Simple-The_Game_Engine
Simple is a fast, modern game/animation engine built for Python developers who want real engine power without the heavyweight setup. It’s designed to feel pro f
C++★421 reviews - 70ArXivToday-Lark
ArXiv Today: Get arXiv daily papers right in your Lark (飞书) via bot.
Python★421 reviews - 71kodeagent
KodeAgent is a minimalistic approach to building AI agents. It's designed to be the robust reasoning core inside your larger system, not the entire platform.
Python★401 reviews - 72model-mapper
A powerful Rust macro to generate boilerplate-free declarations of From, Into, TryFrom, and TryInto traits for
Rust★371 reviews - 73bilig
Formula workbooks for Node services and agent tools.
TypeScript★351 reviews - 74context-aware-browser-petLive
A context-aware browser mascot with 100% local offline AI
TypeScript★331 reviews - 75fingerprint-oss
> A free and open source fingerprinting service unlike FingerprintJS.
TypeScript★271 reviews
Common questions
Why the 48-hour delay before a review is released?
The maintainer can dispute a review that breaks the rules during the window. If there is no dispute, the review is published, credits are granted, and the review is visible to everyone. That keeps the review pool higher quality.
How do you prevent fake reviews and self-dealing?
Sign-in is GitHub-only, so every reviewer is tied to a public developer profile. You cannot review your own repos. Reviews must clear 800 characters before submission. Every review enters a 48-hour dispute window where the maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text. Disputed reviews don't release and the reviewer earns no credits. See our content policy for full rules.
What stops paid boosts from buying #1?
Boosts are a multiplier on your organic score, capped at 2x. A repo with zero reviews scores zero regardless of boosts. A well-reviewed repo always beats a heavily-boosted one. See /rules for the full formula.
What is a credit?
A credit is a point you earn by writing reviews and spend on boosts. New accounts start with 25 free credits. Write an 800-character review and earn 10 more when it's released after the 48-hour dispute window.
Is it free to list my repo?
Yes. Submitting your repo and appearing on the leaderboard costs nothing. You only pay when you want extra visibility. Leaderboard boosts start at $2.
More questions? See the full FAQ →
293
repos listed
300
reviews published
249
developers
Who built this
Jay Campbell
@thejaycampbell·Founder, RepoRanker
I built RepoRanker because the vibe-coding wave produced thousands of new builders shipping in public, and there was nowhere to get substantive peer feedback on the actual work. GitHub is public but passive. Launch communities reward the moment, not the repo. RepoRanker is the place where critiques are earned, not gamed: reviewing another project earns you credits, so the feedback is real and the community has skin in the game.
Ship it. Then prove it.
60 seconds to submit. Zero approval queue. Or start by reviewing a project you already know and earn credits toward your own boost. See pricing for optional visibility options.